Greg Norman just took a bite out of Qantas. Does he have a point?

You have reached your maximum number of saved items.

Remove items from your saved list to add more.

You've used all of your gift articles. 3 more will become available on the 1st of every month.

Greg Norman has never been one to hold back on issues dear to him.

Whether supporting President Donald Trump, or criticising the PGA, the Great White Shark doesn’t shy away from taking a stand.

But his recent sub-par experience on Qantas has touched a nerve with the flying public.

As Norman puts it: “I have always tried to support my national airline Qantas. Sadly, their reputation of the ‘never on-time’ airline ... now has me looking elsewhere.”

Norman’s frustration centres on the late departure of a Sydney-Dallas flight on Saturday. Qantas confirmed the flight arrived two hours and 35 minutes later than scheduled after “engineers fixed a fuelling issue”.

But Norman’s anger speaks for regular Qantas customers, too, delayed for hours on their travels.

Only two weeks earlier, a Qantas flight from Los Angeles to Sydney had been delayed overnight “due to operational requirements”.

Norman’s grievance gains some traction when you consider that against the backdrop of delays, Qantas has been tripping over itself to show off its on-time-performance improvements.

In July, global aviation firm OAG ranked Qantas Airways the most on-time major airline. At the time Qantas Domestic chief executive Markus Svensson said that “there has been a huge amount of work to improve our reliability”.

By September, Qantas had slipped to the No.5 spot on the OAG list.

Qantas domestic on time performance continues to firm, with its August on-time-performance hitting 83.5 per cent, above Virgin Australia at 81.2 per cent, and Qantas-owned Jetstar at 76.7 per cent.

Yet, the scale of competition the Flying Roo faces from overseas rivals puts Qantas customer service into relief.

By other measures, Qantas’ long reputational climb back is far from over.

In the 2026, Skytrax World Airline Award, a survey of the annual airline customer satisfaction, Qantas failed again to crack to the top 10.

Before its annus horribilis of 2022, Qantas had regularly ranked in the top five. Singapore Airlines, a major competitor for international Aussie travellers, took out the No.1 spot in 2026.

The ranking, as well as the delays, raises the question about why some national carriers have retained high customer service levels and perceptions, while other struggle to live up to their past.

There is a double-edged to the Qantas brand – a commercial enterprise with a legacy of being a carrier that represents not just the business interests, but the identity of a nation.

In fact, while the public is largely happy with Qantas customer service and crew, operational issues remain.

The fleet is being renewed, but old planes still fly.

Norman, a former brand ambassador for Qantas, would have waited in Sydney in some comfort. But one of the worst aspects of airline delays is the conditions of waiting.

If, for example, you are waiting but fully connected to the internet you can go on with your affairs. But if you’re waiting and you’re in an internet-dead zone, well, that’s a much harder consumer experience to accept. Especially when paying thousands for the privilege.

Norman mentions the new front in airline competition by name twice: Wi-Fi. He questions how Qantas can’t offer fast Wi-Fi “in this day and age with the cost/ticket”.

Qantas provides Viasat internet service and a map to show the level of connectivity across destinations.

As the golfer observes about Qantas’ Trans-Pacific Wi-Fi offering: “#insane #dated”.

Particularly as major Qantas competitors such as Qatar and Emirates are offering a blanket of superfast Wi-Fi through Starlink.

Qantas has been contacted for comment.

The curse of expectations for Qantas is shared by the other legacy national carriers like British Airways and American Airlines, and past would-be carriers.

A colleague explained to me that it was nearly impossible to publish stories about British Airways without attracting hate mail from readers.

These airlines are burdened with the weight of national nostalgia, and rose-coloured memories of the time when air travel itself was a luxurious rarity.

Heck, British Airways used to fly the Concorde.

But it’s worth considering that somehow the curse of national carrier legacy is not shared by the likes of Singapore Airlines, or the younger Emirates or Qatar Airways.

Norman’s grievance raises the question: where does Qantas lie? On the side of a national carrier with high satisfaction, or one constantly being compared unfavourably to a more glorious past?

The reality is: we want Qantas to be a modern national carrier, with crisp, efficient operations that don’t leave customers hanging.

As Norman’s Instagram lament asked: what happened? “Profit before customer caring, reputation and service!?”

He noted that the ground staff were “excellent”, but he urged Qantas bosses to “get to work and bring back the pride in”.

The public is hearing about the esteemed golfer’s complaint not just because of his big name and sizeable following, but because high-profile figures are firmly on the radar of Qantas’ sophisticated social media team.

Up to 80 per cent of Qantas’ social media interactions are driven either by flight disruptions affecting the masses or by high-value VIP flyers – the Greg Normans of the world.

If only we could all command Qantas’ attention so easily.

The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.